• Home
  • About

Shores of the Dirac Sea

A blog about physics… mostly.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« All is well that ends well
Memorial weekend Biden’s speech »

In my inbox

May 10, 2012 by dberenstein

Sometimes life’s just too funny. I get stuff like this in my inbox from a site that stores old tests:

Why use a study guide when you can have the old
exam? Spend more time partying and less time studying.

Needless to say, when the site advertises things similar to “Why study the night before an exam when you can study on the day of the exam?” I wonder who buys this stuff. In the end it sounds like an invitation to cheat. Fortunately, most of the times this does not work, unless we professors get too lazy. This is when random number generators actually do a great job for science courses.

 

What is more dangerous nowadays is that people cheat by using the internet during exams even if they’re not allowed to. The problem is catching them. Fantastic tools like Wolfram Alpha can be used to remove the thinking out of a problem. Check this one (simple) example I just cooked:

 

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=time+velocity+%3D+120+Km%2Fhr%2C+distance+100+m

 

The main problem is that at some point one actually needs to know if the student actually knows what a velocity really is. Or if the student can actually convert hours to seconds. In the end this is what certification of knowledge is about: we need to be able to certify that a student actually knows this stuff.

In the meantime, in the famous words of Garth and Wayne, party on.

About these ads

Rate this:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Academia, Cheating | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on May 10, 2012 at 9:34 pm starkate

    I used to be a mathematician.I sometimes wonder how much many students understood!!


  2. on May 11, 2012 at 5:31 pm Lubos Motl

    Dear David, I think that you’re on the same frequency as I am but the folks behind e.g. Wolfram Alpha, in particular Stephen’s brother Conrad, are thinking very differently:

    http://blog.wolfram.com/2010/11/23/conrad-wolframs-ted-talk-stop-teaching-calculating-start-teaching-math/

    In the video, Conrad Wolfram essentially advocates this kind of “Wolfram Alpha” cheating. As I’ve discussed in detailed texts, I think that this really means that the kids won’t know what the velocity is. What’s essential is knowing how the gadgets such as Wolfram Alpha operate to get an answer. If answers to questions arrive as a “complete black box”, then the user inevitably fails to understand the concepts.

    So however boring such calculations may be, students must be forced to do them, at least a certain number of times, otherwise their potential to become experts is doomed.

    Cheers
    LM



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Woof Woof
    • Happy 3.1415926535… day
    • Unstable Universes
    • Bad science reporting versus good science reporting
    • If some of my students were writing problems
  • Archives

    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • November 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • September 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
  • May 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Mar   Jul »
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • Recent Comments

    Plato on Woof Woof
    Pepe on Woof Woof
    dberenstein on Woof Woof
    Lubos Motl on Woof Woof
    Wyrd Smythe on Happy 3.1415926535……
  • Physics/Math/Science Blogs

    • Asymptotia (Clifford Johnson)
    • Backreaction
    • Coctail Party Physics
    • Cosmic Variance
    • Dmitry Podolsky
    • Jeffrey Epstein Science
    • John Baez
    • Michael Nielsen
    • Musings (Jacques Distler)
    • Not even wrong
    • Resonaances
    • Robert Helling
    • Shtetl Optimized
    • Sunclipse
    • Terry Tao
    • Tomasso Dorigo
    • Uncertain Principles
  • Science Resources

    • Physics (APS journal)
    • Scientific American
  • Some More Blogs

    • Evil Inc
    • Fafblog
    • phd Comics
    • Regator
    • Scenes from a multiverse
    • Site Meter
    • WordPress.com
    • WordPress.org
  • Pages

    • About
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: