• Home
  • About

Shores of the Dirac Sea

A blog about physics… mostly.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Another week of rumors that get squashed by data releases.
The Open Access frontier. »

Novel Numerical Methods for Strongly Coupled Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Gravity

April 26, 2011 by dberenstein

Here is an announcement of a program I will be organizing at the KITP from Jan 17 thru March 9 2012. It is a program on numerical methods for gravity and QFT. The web page of the program is located here.

Here is the image I made to illustrate the program: it is generated by taking a set of modes in a box with a UV cutoff. Then amplitudes are seeded for these modes with random numbers and phases multiplied by the typical quantum uncertainty on each mode. The result is a picture like the one below.

It is also fun to animate it.

Right now I have to start chasing people and reminding them that the (first) deadline for applications is coming soon (April 30th).

In the meantime stay tuned.

Image of Fluctuations of quantum fields

About these ads

Rate this:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Academia, computers, Conferences, gravity, high energy physics, Physics, quantum fields, Quantum Gravity | 6 Comments

6 Responses

  1. on April 27, 2011 at 7:45 am wolfgang

    Bizoń and Rostworowski have just published a numerical study which suggests that AdS is unstable against small perturbations in classical GR: arxiv.org/abs/1104.3702
    What do you think about it?


    • on April 27, 2011 at 6:23 pm dberenstein

      Hi Wolfgang:

      Without having read the paper in detail:
      Global AdS has a positive energy theorem that shows that AdS is the vacuum (lowest energy state).

      Linearized perturbations seem fine.

      Small perturbations might still do something funny if non-linearities are important. From their paper it seems that this is what happens. The non-linearities take energy from low modes and dump them into high modes (you can think of this as a classical analog of the UV catastrophe, preventing the system from thermalizing). This gets fixed by leading quantum effects. I would not worry.


  2. on April 27, 2011 at 5:55 pm Excited State

    I have never understood programs like this. Do people come and spend almost 2 months during the academic year at your university? Are they faculty, postdocs, or students?


    • on April 27, 2011 at 6:26 pm dberenstein

      Dear Excited:

      Professors have sabbatical leaves. Many choose to spend it in research workshops/ other universities. There are other reasons why people might have time off. For postdocs it is easier because usually they do not teach. A lot of scientific progress can come out of these workshops and most people in the field consider them to be very useful for their career and to reach their scientific goals.


    • on April 28, 2011 at 6:48 am Luboš Motl

      I have spent the first half of 2001 at the KITP in Santa Barbara (a neat place), with my adviser Tom Banks. As far as I remember, my coursework at the Rutgers PhD program had been finished (defense was on 9/11/2001 at 9:30 am not far from New York City haha) and I just could afford to change the place.

      But I believe that grad students, postdocs, and professors may go to such programs even if their schedules are more constrained. KITP is about research work and what people are doing over there is arguably less strictly organized work than what workers are doing in the factories and instructors at average schools but it is still work and very important one.


  3. on April 27, 2011 at 6:22 pm diego t

    nice poster, david!



Comments are closed.

  • Recent Posts

    • Woof Woof
    • Happy 3.1415926535… day
    • Unstable Universes
    • Bad science reporting versus good science reporting
    • If some of my students were writing problems
  • Archives

    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • November 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • September 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
  • April 2011
    M T W T F S S
    « Mar   May »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
  • Recent Comments

    Plato on Woof Woof
    Pepe on Woof Woof
    dberenstein on Woof Woof
    Lubos Motl on Woof Woof
    Wyrd Smythe on Happy 3.1415926535……
  • Physics/Math/Science Blogs

    • Asymptotia (Clifford Johnson)
    • Backreaction
    • Coctail Party Physics
    • Cosmic Variance
    • Dmitry Podolsky
    • Jeffrey Epstein Science
    • John Baez
    • Michael Nielsen
    • Musings (Jacques Distler)
    • Not even wrong
    • Resonaances
    • Robert Helling
    • Shtetl Optimized
    • Sunclipse
    • Terry Tao
    • Tomasso Dorigo
    • Uncertain Principles
  • Science Resources

    • Physics (APS journal)
    • Scientific American
  • Some More Blogs

    • Evil Inc
    • Fafblog
    • phd Comics
    • Regator
    • Scenes from a multiverse
    • Site Meter
    • WordPress.com
    • WordPress.org
  • Pages

    • About
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: