Last time I pointed to the paper by Green, Komargodski, Seiberg, Tachikawa and Wecht (GKSTW) I was asked to show what I would have done differently. Here is a sketch of some things that I would have put as a part of the main paper (this is not to be assumed to be comprehensive, or [...]
Archive for May, 2010
Comments on “Exactly Marginal Deformations and Global Symmetries”
Posted in Physics, quantum fields, tagged conformal field theory, supersymmetry on May 25, 2010 | 4 Comments »
Must read papers of the week
Posted in gravity, Physics, quantum fields, Quantum Gravity, tagged Physics, Quantum Gravity, supersymmetry on May 22, 2010 | 26 Comments »
The Gravity Research Foundation announced the results of the 2010 competition. Here are the results. At UCSB we discussed the prize-winning paper by Mark van Raamsdonk today. It was a very lively discussion and we thought it was a great paper to read. Mark’s paper provided some very tantalyzing evidence that entanglement seems to play [...]
Finding pretty patterns in scientific graphs
Posted in Art, Classical mechanics, Physics on May 13, 2010 | 17 Comments »
Here is a graph I produced today as I was studying some problems I’m interested in. The important thing is not what the graph represents physically: it’s just a bunch of trajectories in a Hamiltonian system. What is interesting is that the patterns look pretty and seem to have meaning.
Wall street blips
Posted in cartoon, Economics, Finance, Ramble, Statistics, tagged large fluctuations, stock market, wall street on May 7, 2010 | 6 Comments »
I don’t know how many of the readers here pay attention to what’s happening in Wall Street. Yesterdays trade was quite spectacular, although from many points of view it is terrifying and it is a day that will probably live in infamy. From the academic point of view I’m sure it will be studied to [...]
The quest for Quantum Ideal liquids
Posted in Experiments, Physics, quantum fields, tagged Physics on May 6, 2010 | 1 Comment »
Clifford Johnson pointed to me his post on the quest for perfect quantum fluids. In a certain sense, we are used to thinking about fluids as low energy phenomena (relatively low temperature physics). Famous fluids are characterized by fun properties like superfluidity, or ferrofluids that can be a lot fund to play with in an [...]
